🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials demands plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The company is attempting changes to a draft bill that include decreasing the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on scented cigarette varieties, and diminished punishments for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year die from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with health policies. In recent weeks, international health experts sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to weaken global control measures.

“Evidence exists of industry lobbying globally. Corporate signatures are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” said the corporate monitoring director.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, the company recommends this be lowered to less than half “following international recommended threshold”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities specifically advises a warning should cover at least 50% of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. In the UK, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for different infractions “varying from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Business explanation

In the letter, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia claims the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but asserts that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Activist reaction

Chimbala said the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he stated.

“We reside in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and harvest that and distribute the goods – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative stated: “The corporation runs its operations according with applicable local laws. Moreover, the company participates in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which provide for stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The company was “not against rules”, they said, noting that underage people should be safeguarded against acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” they said, adding that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which involves increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.